Putting Tiananmen and China Human Rights into Perspective
By now, we’ve seen it all before. The Liberals do something, and they call it something it’s not (i.e. The Employee Free Choice Act and The Fairness Doctrine). Such is the case with what Wang Dan calls “freedom” in defending his Olbermann-esque stance on the “Pro-Democracy” movement and calling it the “truth.”
In a nutshell, many of the claims against China on the issue of “human rights” are unfounded distortions that support Hillary Clinton and the left. Wang Dan’s claim that “the reforms my fellow students and I were advocating are the central challenges shaping China’s destiny today.“ are about as much of a slander as Bill Clinton taking credit for the good economy that paid off the deficit. To put this scenario into perspective – Deng Xiao Ping was the one who worked with Nixon and Reagan to build the capitalism that China’s economy stands on today. Hence, the word “truth” is far from any leftist agenda with regards to the dictionary’s definition of the word “truth.”
Why is this definition being so distorted? Basically, Wang Dan went on to attend Harvard, which is a school that may have once pumped out great intellectuals such as Theodore Roosevelt, but more recently have given into the funding of Prince Alwaleed, who has a reputation of pandering his personal Anti-American ideas (i.e. the Prince once showed up at Rudy Giuliani’s office with a $1 million check suggesting that 911 happened because of America’s support of Israel).
How much does funding like this influence Harvard as an academic institution an on the curricula that is taught there? Look at the results. Harvard has been pumping out people who push the wrong ideas such as Barack Obama and Wang Dan.
To understand the truth about Tiananmen and the Human Rights issue in China, we have to go back in time to when Tibet was still under the rule of the Dalai Lama because the true atrocity of this period lies within the Dalai Lama’s rule. Under the guise of having a “peaceful” religion, the people under the Dalai Lama were encouraged to take pilgrimages where they would take one step, then kneel for hours (and sometimes days) in prayer, and take another step, then kneel and do the same thing over again. Sick, diseased, and dead people were not uncommon due to this practice. This practice also made their villages vulnerable to attack by nomads.
Some may say that it was the peoples‘ choice to follow the Dalai Lama, but these are the same people who turn a blind eye to the fact that when Mao’s troops rolled in, the effort was for a noble rescue. This is the same blind eye that Hillary Clinton once went to China to promote a “human rights” uprising, and it’s also the same emotional irrationality that promoted the 1989 “Pro-Democracy” movement of which Wang Dan was a leader of in China.
Who can blame the imprisonment of such a dangerous movement and why was this dangerous? If this “Pro-Democracy” movement had succeeded back then when China was still struggling to feed all the hungry mouths, it would have collapsed the capitalistic infrastructure that Deng Xiao Ping had designed for China that we see today because they would have needed a re-structuring of their entire government. This would have done a lot more damage than good.
It is true that China still does not have a Jeffersonian Constitution and Democracy like we do here in the United States. But they’ve sure come a long way. On our end, we had better start concentrating on defending our own against this liberal Saudi-backed machine.
Much of this information that I have presented here is often not found in English. The Liberals hide it so well just like they hide the fact that a pair of scissors has to be inserted into the cranium of an child that is 90% born during a partial-birth abortion. However, if you talk to anyone with any bit of an education from China, Taiwan, Singapore, or Hong Kong, they can verify that what I have said is fact.
Tags: china, dan, democracy, human, Obama, pro, rights, tiananmen, wang
You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.